If your roof is beginning to show signs of wear or leakage, a full replacement might seem like the only solution. However, before committing to a complete “rip and replace,” it’s worth considering whether your roof may qualify for a more economical option—a roof restoration system.
Demonstrated Lifecycle Benefits
A recent study by Trinity ERD, a respected building envelope consulting firm, examined the lifecycle costs associated with conventional roof replacement versus restoration using Industrial Grade Silicone White Roof Coating. The analysis revealed that over a 40-year period, a silicone roof restoration could provide substantial cost advantages, making it a highly effective and economical alternative to replacement.
Roof restoration vs. replacement:
Roof restoration vs. replacement:
Four Times the
Cost Savings
Provides energy savings up to 50%*
Supports cool roof coating rebates and tax incentives
Prevents repair- related disruptions to the building and its occupants
Reduces landfill waste and impact on smog/air quality
Roof replacement vs. silicone restoration cost over a 40 year period
Roof replacement vs. silicone restoration cost over a 40 year period
2 additional Mod Bit systems vs
2 Silicone Recoats
(50,000 sq. ft. roof in Orlando, FL)
2 additional EPDM Bit systems vs
2 Silicone Recoats
(50,000 sq. ft. roof in Dallas, TX)
2 additional TPO Bit systems vs
2 Silicone Recoats
(50,000 sq. ft. roof in Phoenix, AZ)
